concerns related to simplicity, security, and decentralization.

Such Bitcoiners may be more interested in inscriptions than Ethereum NFTs,
unlocking new classes of collector.

*Inscriptions have a richer data model.*

Inscriptions consist of a content type, also known as a MIME type, and content,
which is an arbitrary byte string. This is the same data model used by the web,
and allows inscription content to evolve with the web, and come to support any
kind of content supported by web browsers, without requiring changes to the
underlying protocol.

### RGB and Taro assets?

RGB and Taro are both second-layer asset protocols built on Bitcoin. Compared
to inscriptions, they are much more complicated, but much more featureful.

Ordinal theory has been designed from the ground up for digital artifacts,
whereas the primary use-case of RGB and Taro are fungible tokens, so the user
experience for inscriptions is likely to be simpler and more polished than the
user experience for RGB and Taro NFTs.

RGB and Taro both store content off-chain, which requires additional